<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Competency?  The Answer Seems Subject To Change.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ohsas18001expert.com/2008/08/25/what-is-competency-the-answer-seems-subject-to-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ohsas18001expert.com/2008/08/25/what-is-competency-the-answer-seems-subject-to-change/</link>
	<description>Operational Health and Safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:19:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thea</title>
		<link>http://ohsas18001expert.com/2008/08/25/what-is-competency-the-answer-seems-subject-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Thea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ohsas18001expert.com/?p=52#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Unlike ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 does NOT require that persons &quot;working on behalf&quot; of the organization be competent.  Instead, the requirement is that the organization &quot;ensure&quot; that persons &quot;working under its control&quot; performing tasks that can impact on OH&amp;S are competent.

This is an important distinction.  Individuals may work on an organization&#039;s behalf, and therefore need to be competent for purposes of ISO 14001, but that work may not under the control of the organization.  In that case, the organization does not need to ensure their competency for purposes of OHSAS 18001.  The issue is not the nature of the work being done but the control the organization has over the work activity being performed.

An organization can &quot;ensure&quot; that individuals are competent in a variety of ways.  This can include requiring that contractors are able to demonstrate that their employees have the necessary competency to work safely.

Like ISO 14001, this competency requirement also does not apply to every job, position or task.  In determining what activities &quot;could impact on OH&amp;S&quot; the organization should consider the results of the organization&#039;s risk assessment, whether the tasks being performed are intended to reduce OH&amp;S risks and/or whether the tasks are specific to the implementation of the OHSMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 does NOT require that persons &#8220;working on behalf&#8221; of the organization be competent.  Instead, the requirement is that the organization &#8220;ensure&#8221; that persons &#8220;working under its control&#8221; performing tasks that can impact on OH&#038;S are competent.</p>
<p>This is an important distinction.  Individuals may work on an organization&#8217;s behalf, and therefore need to be competent for purposes of ISO 14001, but that work may not under the control of the organization.  In that case, the organization does not need to ensure their competency for purposes of OHSAS 18001.  The issue is not the nature of the work being done but the control the organization has over the work activity being performed.</p>
<p>An organization can &#8220;ensure&#8221; that individuals are competent in a variety of ways.  This can include requiring that contractors are able to demonstrate that their employees have the necessary competency to work safely.</p>
<p>Like ISO 14001, this competency requirement also does not apply to every job, position or task.  In determining what activities &#8220;could impact on OH&#038;S&#8221; the organization should consider the results of the organization&#8217;s risk assessment, whether the tasks being performed are intended to reduce OH&#038;S risks and/or whether the tasks are specific to the implementation of the OHSMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOHAN</title>
		<link>http://ohsas18001expert.com/2008/08/25/what-is-competency-the-answer-seems-subject-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>MOHAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ohsas18001expert.com/?p=52#comment-307</guid>
		<description>What is meant competency requirement of workers and those working on behalf of the company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is meant competency requirement of workers and those working on behalf of the company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christel Fouche</title>
		<link>http://ohsas18001expert.com/2008/08/25/what-is-competency-the-answer-seems-subject-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Christel Fouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ohsas18001expert.com/?p=52#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Interesting content. Are we not perhaps making a simple definition too complicated. &quot;Competent&quot; is the effective balance between knowledge and skill. This however is determined by the area or subject of concern. Although adequate knowledge is necessary to be an auditor, the emphasis would lean heavier on the actual application of this knowledge in reality (in other words &quot;skill&quot;) within the auditor discipline. However if we take &quot;workplace inspections&quot; the knowledge part is critical at this level whereas the application would still be important but the balance would weigh heavier on the knowledge part as opposed to the skill part. The definition of competency remains as described in the article - it is the subject that differs in level that requires different approaches towards successful application. Regards. Christel. 
www.christelfouche.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting content. Are we not perhaps making a simple definition too complicated. &#8220;Competent&#8221; is the effective balance between knowledge and skill. This however is determined by the area or subject of concern. Although adequate knowledge is necessary to be an auditor, the emphasis would lean heavier on the actual application of this knowledge in reality (in other words &#8220;skill&#8221;) within the auditor discipline. However if we take &#8220;workplace inspections&#8221; the knowledge part is critical at this level whereas the application would still be important but the balance would weigh heavier on the knowledge part as opposed to the skill part. The definition of competency remains as described in the article &#8211; it is the subject that differs in level that requires different approaches towards successful application. Regards. Christel.<br />
<a href="http://www.christelfouche.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.christelfouche.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
